|
August 30, 2026 · The Sunday Brief No. 015 · Cape Coral, FL
|
FREE EDITION
|
|
What's being built · What it means
|
|
|
4 to 4
The tie that killed a motion to reconsider the Special Magistrate ordinance. A second 4-4 tie later blocked even sending it back for discussion. The Hearing Examiner stays.
|
|
|
6 to 2
The split on stormwater, residential solid waste, and fire. Long and Kaduk voted no each time. Every FY 2027 rate and assessment still passed and heads to your November tax bill.
|
|
|
Nov 3
The General Election date Council formally called, 8 to 0, after certifying the August primary and the three charter amendments. Mayor and Districts 1, 4, and 6 are on the ballot.
|
|
|
|
City Council · August 26 Regular Meeting · On the Record
|
|
The Special Magistrate vote failed again. Then the dais spent ten minutes arguing about what it had actually voted on.
|
|
Last week we reported that Council rejected Ordinance 20-26, the plan to replace the Hearing Examiner with a Special Magistrate, on August 19. On Wednesday it came back. Before the agenda was adopted, Council Member Donnell moved to reconsider it, drew a second, and the roll call tied four to four. A tie does not carry, so the reconsideration failed. That matched our preview. What we did not expect came near the end of the meeting, when it became clear that members of this Council do not agree on what their own votes have done to the Hearing Examiner.
|
|
The question nobody could answer cleanly
|
|
During Council reports, Council Member Long asked a plain question: with the Hearing Examiner's contract ending, when does the city advertise to hire a new one? The answer opened a disagreement. The City Attorney noted the Special Magistrate the city approved in April is authorized to sit for quasi-judicial matters. Long pressed on whether that April hire had effectively replaced the Hearing Examiner. The City Attorney said no. Long then asked why, if nothing had changed, the city brought Ordinance 20-26 forward at all, the ordinance Council has now declined twice.
|
|
The City Manager stepped in to settle it. His account was direct: his staff will keep bringing land use and development cases to the Hearing Examiner under the exact process in place today, because Council did not vote to change that process. He called Ordinance 20-26 a procedural change to how staff handles those cases, said the body voted it down, so the old process continues unchanged. This was never a personnel matter, he said, and he did not know why it was being framed as one.
|
|
The exchange grew pointed. The City Attorney said Long had earlier suggested nefarious activity in how cases get scheduled before particular magistrates. Long countered that he had raised an appearance of impropriety, not an accusation, and noted the magistrate hired in April lives and practices in Miami rather than nearby. Council Member Steinke raised a point of order, arguing Council reports were not the place to relitigate a matter already voted down. The Mayor agreed and ruled it an offline discussion.
|
|
Before that, the Mayor had polled the dais on whether to bring the Special Magistrate question back for a future Committee of the Whole discussion. That consensus also split four to four, so it did not carry. Long asked for it to be scheduled so the difference between the two positions could be explained on the record; a majority did not agree. The result is that the same question failed on two separate four to four ties in one meeting, once as a reconsideration and once as a request just to talk about it further.
|
|
What the record shows
The bottom line, stated plainly because the meeting did not: the Hearing Examiner process for land use cases is unchanged, and staff will route those cases exactly as before. The reconsideration of Ordinance 20-26 failed on a four to four tie, and a follow-up move to schedule a discussion failed on a second. The record also shows members of this Council openly disagree about what their April Special Magistrate vote did, and asked for a briefing a majority declined to schedule. We report the tallies and the exchange as they occurred. The Final Action Summary is the authority on the counts.
|
|
Sources: City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting complete Transcript, August 26, 2026, for the reconsideration roll call, the Council reports exchange among Council Member Long, the City Attorney, and the City Manager, the point of order, and the second four to four consensus; City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting Final Action Summary, August 19, 2026, and Cape Coral Digest Issue No. 014, August 23, 2026, for the prior week's result.
|
|
|
Your Tax Bill · FY 2026-2027 Rates and Assessments
|
|
Every FY 2027 fee and assessment passed. Three of them drew the same two no votes.
|
|
Most of Wednesday's agenda was the annual rate machinery: the resolutions certifying what the city collects through the non-ad valorem line of your Lee County tax bill. All of it passed, but the votes were not uniform. Long and Kaduk voted no on the stormwater fee, the residential solid waste assessment, and the fire assessment. Long also voted no, alone, on the master roll. Lot mowing and delinquent collections passed unanimously. Here is where each number landed, with the recorded vote.
|
|
Resolution 221-26 · Passed 6-2
Stormwater user fee
$163 per residential unit, up from $156. Funds swale regrading, canal dredging, drainage and flood projects. Long and Kaduk voted no.
|
|
|
Resolution 222-26 · Passed 6-2
Solid waste (residential)
Total residential assessment holds flat at $384.25 per unit. Hauler and disposal costs rose; a cut in the city operating share offset them. Long and Kaduk voted no.
|
|
|
Resolution 223-26 · Passed 6-2
Fire protection
Total revenue drops to $66.85 million at 81 percent recovery. The average single family assessment falls to $515.43 from $540.17. Long and Kaduk voted no.
|
|
|
Resolution 224-26 · Passed 8-0
Lot mowing
Per unit rates rise across all four districts, from $48.43 in District 4 to $75.89 in District 1. Vacant lots are mowed thirteen times a year. Unanimous.
|
|
|
Resolution 225-26 · Passed 8-0
Delinquent deferrals
Puts about $59,000 in one legacy deferred UEP account and $46,658 across eleven hardship properties back onto the tax roll. Unanimous.
|
|
|
Resolution 226-26 · Passed 7-1
Annual assessment roll
Certifies the utility assessment rolls to the Tax Collector. About $44.7 million total, with North 1 East listed for the first time. Long voted no.
|
|
|
One more ran through the consent agenda: Resolution 220-26, the annual CPI adjustment to commercial solid waste rates, passed six to two with the same Long and Kaduk no votes. Council Member Lastra pulled it for clarification, and the Finance Director explained the city neither bills nor keeps that money; WastePro bills commercial accounts directly under a contractual CPI escalator. That matters for anyone reading it as new city revenue. It is not.
|
|
The UEP line most people miss
|
|
Inside Resolution 226-26 is a number worth flagging for anyone tracking the Utilities Extension Project. The annual roll now lists North 1 East, established in November 2025, with roughly $10.5 million in estimated FY 2027 revenue, alongside North 1 West at about $13.2 million and North 2 at about $9.3 million. This is the roll that carries utility expansion assessments from a project area onto individual tax bills. We flagged earlier that first North 1 East assessments were expected on the November bill. The roll certified this week, over Long's lone no vote, is where that starts.
|
|
On the figures and the votes
Dollar figures are from the staff presentations at the hearings; the vote counts are from the roll calls in the meeting record. The Final Action Summary confirms the final adopted figures and is the authority if any number shifts. Parcel level rolls are posted by the city. Several residents pressed hard on a reserve now near $35 million inside the solid waste fund and on the fire math; we treat those as resident statements, and flag any figure that came from a speaker rather than a certified document.
|
|
Sources: City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting complete Transcript, August 26, 2026, for the roll calls and staff presentations on Resolutions 220-26 through 226-26; City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting Revised Agenda Full Package, August 26, 2026, for the resolution text and assessment tables.
|
|
|
Elections · The Ballot Is Set
|
|
Council certified the primary and called the November 3 General Election, both 8 to 0.
|
|
Two addendum resolutions closed the loop on the August 18 primary. Resolution 235-26 certified the results using the official Lee County Supervisor of Elections returns, which also carried the three charter amendments voters approved. Resolution 236-26 called the General Election for November 3, 2026, for Mayor and Council in Districts 1, 4, and 6. Both passed unanimously. The City Attorney was blunt when Council Member Kaduk asked what happens if the body declines: there is no option, the city must certify, and refusing would only invite a lawsuit and force the matter back onto a future agenda.
|
|
As we reported after the primary, the mayoral race narrowed to two candidates advancing to November, and the sitting Mayor did not make that runoff. District 1 and District 6 each head to a runoff between their top two finishers, and District 4 also appears on the November ballot. We will publish a full candidate by candidate breakdown, with the certified vote totals, as the field firms up.
|
|
Sources: City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting complete Transcript, August 26, 2026, for the roll calls and the City Attorney's guidance on Resolutions 235-26 and 236-26; Lee County Supervisor of Elections official Summary Results, 2026 Primary Election.
|
|
|
From the Podium · What Residents Raised
|
|
A packed citizens input drew surveillance cameras, Marine Patrol, and the budget into the same night.
|
|
License plate readers and the Flock question
|
|
Resident Wes Owen asked Council to pause the city's citywide automated license plate reader system until public safeguards are adopted. He argued the technology arrived through a 2024 speed detection contract rather than an express vote to build a surveillance network, and pointed to a recent out of city case in which one officer allegedly searched a single plate hundreds of times before a reporter, not internal controls, caught it. His ask was for independent oversight, review of unusual searches, and Council approval before any expansion. Council Members Kilraine and Steinke responded, Kilraine pointing to a police white paper on technology and the Fourth Amendment, Steinke agreeing guardrails matter while defending the technology's usefulness. No action was on the agenda; this was input and Council response.
|
|
Marine Patrol staffing on 400 miles of canal
|
|
Resident Tim Daly asked whether the city's Marine unit is sized for a place built on water, and requested a report on staffing, vessels, patrol hours, and response times. Council Member Lastra, who says she rides along yearly, put current staffing on the record as four Marine officers and a working sergeant, and noted police staffing requests have been funded at roughly half the ask in recent years. She framed response times as priority driven, with emergent calls answered faster than wake zone complaints.
|
|
Budget pressure, the solid waste reserve, and Bimini East
|
|
Several speakers turned the rate hearings into a budget argument. Tom Shadrach pressed on a solid waste reserve he pegged near $35 million and asked why commercial waste revenue is not credited against residential overhead. Lisa Cohen-Adkinson, one of the two candidates advancing to the November mayoral ballot, walked through fund balance gaps and executive pay and asked the city to reconcile its own balanced budget policy and publish director level pay before the first budget hearing, closing with a call to reopen the Bimini East RFP. The City Manager pushed back, arguing that framing the Bimini redevelopment as the city handing a developer $100 million misreads how CRA funded partnership work is assigned, and stating there has never been a $500 million concessionaire projection at the JC Park site. We report these as the competing statements they were, from residents, a candidate, and staff, and will keep verifying the figures against primary budget documents before adopting any as fact.
|
|
Sources: City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting complete Transcript, August 26, 2026, for citizen input and Council and staff responses. Speaker figures are attributed as stated estimates, not certified city figures.
|
|
|
Also on the Record · Quick Hits
|
|
The clapping debate ended where it started
|
|
The meeting opened with a long exchange over whether the public may applaud during the business portion of a meeting, which the rules prohibit. At the August 19 meeting, run by the Mayor Pro Tem, applause went ungaveled; on Wednesday, with the Mayor back, Council Member Donnell proposed suspending the rule for the night to avoid enforcing this week what went unenforced last week. Members floated and withdrew several motions, the City Attorney explained the options were to amend, suspend, or leave the rules alone, and in the end no motion to change them carried. The clapping prohibition stands. Steinke took responsibility for not gaveling the applause a week earlier.
|
|
31 years, recognized from the dais
|
|
The Mayor opened recognitions by honoring Dennis Velez of the Parks and Recreation Department, retiring after 31 years as a chemical specialist. It is the kind of institutional memory a fast growing city runs on.
|
|
The School District landscaping appeal was heard Friday
|
|
As previewed, a separate Appeal of Decisions hearing convened Friday, August 28, at 2 p.m. on a single case, APL26-000005. The Lee County District School Board appealed the Hearing Examiner's denial of four landscaping deviations, covering total tree planting, foundation landscaping, off-street parking and vehicle use area planting, and buffer requirements, for a site at 214 NW 20th Avenue. It is a clean test of the same Hearing Examiner authority Council spent Wednesday arguing about. We attended and will report the decision, with the reasoning on each deviation, once the written outcome is on record.
|
|
Sources: City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting complete Transcript, August 26, 2026, for the decorum discussion and the retirement recognition; City of Cape Coral Appeal of Decisions Agenda Full Package, August 28, 2026, for the scope of APL26-000005.
|
|
|
What to Watch · The Week Ahead
|
|
September 2: the carried-forward hearings
|
|
The next Regular Meeting is Tuesday, September 2 at 4 p.m. Two ordinances introduced on August 19 are set for their public hearings: Ordinance 45-26 on accessory structure and garage standards, and Ordinance 51-26, a conservation easement amendment at Yellow Fever Creek Preserve. The two Lee BIA Builders Care donation parcels are also expected back for Introduction.
|
|
A Committee of the Whole with two live items
|
|
Council added two items to an upcoming Committee of the Whole on Wednesday: a request from Council Member Kaduk to take up the Sandoval replat application near Hayden Lane, and a request from Council Member Lastra to move the citizens input camera back to the podium. Watch whether the Special Magistrate question resurfaces there too, given the unresolved dispute on the dais, even though a majority declined to schedule it this week.
|
|
September 28: North 3 UEP assessments
|
|
A Special Meeting on the North 3 UEP Initial Assessment Resolutions is on the calendar for September 28. North 3 is the next major phase of the Utilities Extension Project, in design and estimated in the hundreds of millions. Initial assessment resolutions set the framework for what North 3 property owners will eventually pay, so circle this one if you own land in that footprint.
|
|
Sources: City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting complete Transcript, August 26, 2026, for the September 2 meeting date and the Committee of the Whole additions; City of Cape Coral City Council Regular Meeting Final Action Summary, August 19, 2026, for the September 2 introductions; Cape Coral Digest carry-forward tracker for the North 3 Special Meeting.
|
|
|
Editor's Pick · Local Happening
|
|
Field of Flags opens at Bernice Braden Park
|
Cape Coral, FL
|
|
This is the week the display goes up. Under the permit Council approved on August 19, Sun Broadcasting plants 2,977 American flags at Bernice Braden Park, one for every life lost on September 11, 2001, with the field standing through mid-September. Volunteers set the flags in early September at the park near the foot of the Cape Coral bridge. If you have never walked the rows, this is the month to do it. Bring someone who remembers, and give yourself a few quiet minutes in the field.
|
|
Editor's pick. Not a paid placement.
|
|
Bernice Braden Park, Cape Coral, FL · Display up through mid-September
|
|
|
|
Sponsor
|
|
Need a website that matches the quality of your work? caloosa.studio builds clean, fast sites for Cape Coral small businesses.
|
|
|
|
That is The Sunday Brief No. 015. The headline was predictable: the Special Magistrate plan failed a second time. The surprise was watching the dais discover, out loud, that it does not agree on what its own votes have done to the Hearing Examiner, then decline on another four to four tie to schedule a briefing about it. Around that, six rate and assessment resolutions passed, three over two no votes, and every one lands on your November tax bill, North 1 East for the first time. Council certified the primary, set the November 3 ballot, and heard residents press on surveillance cameras, Marine Patrol, and a budget many do not trust. This is the machinery of a fast-growing city, and it decides more about your bill and your block than any headline does.
|
|
If someone forwarded this to you and you want it in your inbox every Sunday at 7 PM, subscribe free at thecapecoraldigest.com. Cape Coral is growing fast. This is the newsletter that tracks where and how.
|
|
|
Want to reach these readers?
|
|
The Sunday Brief offers clearly labeled sponsor placements per issue. If your business serves Cape Coral property owners, builders, or buyers, reach out at [email protected] and we will talk fit.
|
|
|